Life Sciences Teachers’ Profiles, Knowledge, Skills, Extent of Use, and Challenges in Utilizing Virtual Laboratories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58249/v33hpq89Keywords:
Extent of use, Coping strategies, Knowledge, Skills, Virtual LaboratoryAbstract
This descriptive-correlational study examined the profiles, knowledge, skills, extent of use, and challenges faced by teachers in utilizing virtual laboratories. The respondents were 176 Junior High School Life Sciences teachers from public secondary schools in the Schools Divisions of Ilocos Norte, City of Batac, and Laoag City, selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered using an adapted survey questionnaire. Most participants were female, aged of 30–34, with the position of Teacher II and four to six years of teaching experience. A majority had no training in virtual laboratories. Findings showed that teachers' knowledge, skills, and usage of virtual laboratories were at a moderate level, with strong correlations among these variables. Major challenges identified included difficulty in platform utilization, lack of awareness of resources, professional restructuring issues, poor internet connectivity, and insufficient training and facilities. Thematic analysis revealed four coping strategies, which are the use of alternative modes, training/seminars/workshops, provision of materials, and visual learning implementation. Despite the challenges, learners found virtual laboratories exciting and motivating due to their ICT and 21st-century learning features. Teachers reported that these tools are easy to access and manipulate. Most respondents recommend integrating virtual laboratories into science teaching, recognizing both their potential and limitations.
References
Abubakar, H. (2018). Impact of internet technology usage on job performance of senior secondary school teachers in kaduna state Nigeria. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 10(2), 152-167.
Alhashem, F., & Alfailakawi, A. (2023). Technology-enhanced learning through virtual laboratories in chemistry education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep474.
Ayoubi, C., & Thurm, B. (2022b). Knowledge diffusion and morality: Why do we freely share valuable information with strangers? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 32(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12496
Babatimehin, T., Chidubem Deborah, A., & Oluseyi Peter, A. (2022). Comparative analysis of number correct and item pattern scoring methods for WAEC and NECO chemistry items among senior secondary students in Osun state. The Universal Academic Research Journal, 4(1), 32– 39.
Batuyong, T., & Antonio, M. (2018). The impact of Physics Education Technology (PhET) interactive simulation-based activities on student performance and learning experiences in electromagnetism. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
Byukusenge, T. (2022). Lesson plan analysis protocol (LPAP): A useful tool for researchers and educational evaluators. Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).
Bohr, T. M. (2014). Teachers' perspectives on online virtual labs vs. hands-on labs in high school science (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Borgerding, L., Sadler, T. D., & Koroly, M. (2013). Teachers’ concerns about science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
Bugarso, J. M. S., Cabantugan, R. E., Tapiculin, Q. D., & Malaco, A. C. (2021). Students’ learning experiences and preferences in performing science experiments using hands-on and virtual laboratories. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 1(2), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijotis.v1i2.41122.
D’Angelo, C. (2018, July 9). The impact of technology: Student engagement and success. In Tech and Curriculum. Pressbooks. https://pressbooks.pub/techandcurriculum/chapter/engagement-and-success/.
Dawson, V., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students' argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school DNA and gene mutations. Research in Science Education.
Donald, S., Washer, B., & Wright, M. (2006). A Delphi study to identify recommended science competencies for first-year/initially certified technology education teachers. Journal of Technology Education.
Dunham, T., Wells, J., & White, K. (2002). Science education: A multiple instructional strategies approach. Journal of Technology Education.
Falode, O. C. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude and intentions towards virtual laboratory package utilization in teaching and learning of Physics.
Faour, M. A., & Ayoubi, Z. (2018). The effect of using virtual labs on grade 10 students’ conceptual understanding and their attitudes. Jounal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 4(2), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.387482.
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717-732.
Ghergulescu, I., Moldovan, A. N., Muntean, C. H., & Muntean, G. M. (2019, May). Evaluation of an interactive personalised virtual lab in secondary schools. In International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 538-556). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58459-7_29.
Goldschmidt, M., & Bogner, F. (2015). Learning about DNA and gene mutation in an outreach laboratory: Influence of motivation and gender on students’ cognitive achievement. International Journal of Science Education.
Hamed, G., & Aljanazrah, A. (2020). The effectiveness if using virtual experiments on students’ learning in the general physics lab.
Isozaki, T. (2017). Laboratory work as a teaching method: A historical case study of the institutionalization of laboratory science in Japan. Espacio, Tiempo y Educación, 4(1), 101-120.
João, M., Costa, P., Lencastre, L., & Tavares, F. (2012). Multidimensional analysis of high school students' perceptions about science. Journal of Biological Education.
Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & de Jong, T. (2019). Using hands-on and virtual laboratories alone or together―which works better for acquiring knowledge and skills? Journal of science education and technology, 28(1), 231-250.
Kocjancic, E., & Flowers, A. M., III. (2021). Virtual labs and interactive chapters for college biology education. SimBio.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.
Kumar, V., & Kymissis, I. (2023). MicroLED/LED electro-optical integration techniques for non-display applications. Applied Physics Reviews, 10(2).
Lavanya, R., Yeilumuthu, R., & Ramachandran. (2010). A study on the effectiveness of virtual laboratories in e-learning. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering.
Lestari, D. P., Supahar, Paidi, Suwarjo, & Herianto. (2023). Effect of science virtual laboratory combination with demonstration methods on lower-secondary school students’ scientific literacy ability in a science course. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16153- 16175.
Lisbeth, V., & Michael, M. (2019). Virtual laboratory simulation in the education of laboratory technicians–motivation and study intensity. Biochemistry and Molecular Life Sciences Education.
Marikyan, D. & Papagiannidis, S. (2023) Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed), TheoryHub Book. https://open.ncl.ac.uk.
Mitchell, L. D., Parlamis, J. D., & Claiborne, S. A. (2015). Overcoming faculty avoidance of online education: From resistance to support to active participation. Journal of Management Education, 39(3), 350-371.
Mukama, E., & Byukusenge, P. (2022b). Supporting student active engagement in chemistry learning with computer simulations: Five actions. Tenth Pan-Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning. https://doi.org/10.56059/pcf10.3054
Ngoyi, L. (2013). Benefits and challenges associated with using virtual laboratories and solutions to overcome them (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University).
Omolafe, A. (2021). Construction process of robotic devices to teach the aspect of auto mechanic in Nigeria basic schools. International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development, 11(1), 215-228.
Ong, A. K., Prasetyo, Y. T., Chuenyindee, T., Young, M. N., Doma, B. T., Caballes, D. G., Centeno, R. S., Morfe, A. S., & Bautista, C. S. (2019). Preference analysis on the online learning attributes among senior high school students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A conjoint analysis approach. Evaluation and Program Planning.
Pavlou, Y., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2024). Using Physical and Virtual Labs for Experimentation in STEM + Education: From Theory and Research to Practice. In Shaping the Future of Biological Education Research (Vol 1).
Radhamani, R., Kumar, D., Nizar, N., Achuthan, K., Nair, B., & Diwakar, S. (2021). What virtual laboratory usage tells us about laboratory skill education pre-and post-COVID-19: Focus on usage, behavior, intention and adoption. Education and information technologies, 26(6), 7477-7495.
Rajendran, L., Veilumuthu, R., & Divya, J. (2010). A study on the effectiveness of virtual lab in E-learning. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 2(6).
Raman, R., Achuthan, K., Nair, V. K., & Nedungadi, P. (2022). Virtual Laboratories: historical review and bibliometric analysis of the past three decades. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11055-11087.
Ratamun, M. M., & Osman, K. (2018). The effectiveness of virtual lab compared to physical lab in the mastery of science process skills for chemistry experiments. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(4), 544.
Ruiz, G. (2020). Teachers' level of knowledge, skills, extent of use, perspective and concerns about game-based learning platforms in teaching and learning of physics. [Unpublished masters thesis]. Mariano Marcos State University, Graduate School, Laoag City.
Santos, M. L., & Prudente, M. (2022). Perceptions of public-school teachers on the use of virtual laboratories in teaching science. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning (IC4E).
Scalise, D. (2020). Technology in education: Innovations for online teaching and learning. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technology in Education, ICTE 2020, Macau, China, August 19-22, 2020, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 3-12). Springer.
Taculod, N. J. O., & Arcilla Jr, F. E. (2020). Enhancing the Academic Performance and Learning Interest in Biology of Grade 10 Students Using Expanded PowerPoint Instruction. SMCC Higher Education Research Journal (Teacher Education Journal), 2(1).
Tuazon, L. (2019). Utilization of learning management system (LMS) in teaching physical education. ERIC.
Viernes, J.P.M., (2020). Digital game-based learning materials in the Life Sciences. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Mariano Marcos State University, Graduate School, Laoag City.
Yamaç, A., Öztürk, E., & Mutlu, N. (2020). Effect of digital writing instruction with tablets on primary school students’ writing performance and writing knowledge. Computers and Education, 157, 103981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103981.
Zhang, L., Deng, Q., Zhang, H., Yang, Z., Pang, X., Bobrovs, V., & Yu, X. (2023). Quantum noise secured terahertz communications. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 29(5).

Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 SEAQIS International Conference on Science Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.